Quirk's Blog

Super Bowl ad-champs use paws and guffaws

What’s the key to winning this Sunday’s Super Bowl ad shootout? Data from Mountain View, Calif., research firm Ace Metrix shows that nearly every top-10 Super Bowl ad for the last three years has used either humor and/or animals as a key creative tool. Doritos, the most effective Super Bowl advertiser over the last three years, according to the firm’s metrics, has seen great success using both of these elements: its No. 1-ranked 2011 Super Bowl hit “Pug Attack” is a great example. Budweiser’s use of its emblematic Clydesdales in 2010 earned it the top spot among Super Bowl ads, though the beer maker has not seen the same Super Bowl success since.

“Humor that appeals to the masses is really the hallmark of a good Super Bowl ad. Some advertisers make the mistake of using humor to appeal to only one demographic – Budweiser and Bud Light have made this mistake during past Super Bowls, trying to earn a chuckle from the male audience while turning off women,” said Peter Daboll, CEO of Ace Metrix, in a press release. “On the other hand, Budweiser’s use of the Clydesdales – which we are rumored to see again in this year’s Super Bowl – has been extremely effective. This more mature approach, at least for beer, plays better with the broad Super Bowl audience than humor that is polarizing.”

As for animals, Coca-Cola’s polar bears rival any other consistently-used animal by a brand during the Super Bowl. Three of the top 10 Super Bowl ads of 2012 featured the Coke polar bears, which performed much better with audiences than Pepsi’s celebrity-driven efforts. “It will be interesting to see how Coca-Cola attacks the Super Bowl this year given their recent anti-obesity campaign that has seen such success among consumers. Its latest two-minute ad achieved an Ace Score of 669, rivaling some of the company’s past Super Bowl creative,” said Daboll.

In 2011, Pepsi Max benefited from the “Crash the Super Bowl” contest, beating out Coca-Cola, But, in comparing the two years, the polar bears trumped humor in the soda category.

By contrast, another Super Bowl staple, the car ad, succeeded not by using humor or animals but by using strong corporate messaging like “Made in America.” Chrysler’s two-minute homage to Detroit starring Clint Eastwood was the most effective Super Bowl automotive ad from the last three years, followed closely by Honda’s Ferris Bueller homage and Volkswagen’s successful use of animals in 2012 and 2011, respectively, with “Dog Strikes Back” and “Black Beetle.”

 

10 Most-Effective Super Bowl Ads Using Animals (2010-2012)

 

Brand Ad Title

SB Year

Ace Score*

Ranking during SB Year

Doritos Pug Attack

2011

662

#1

Coca-Cola The Catch

2012

654

#3

Doritos Man’s Best Friend

2012

645

#4

Coca-Cola Superstitions

2012

640

#5

Skechers Go Run Mr. Quiggly

2012

629

#8

Budweiser Fence

2010

626

#1

Doritos Underdog

2010

621

#2

Bridgestone Carma

2011

618

#6

Coca-Cola Argh

2012

600

#10

Volkswagen Dog Strikes Back

2012

590

#13

Volkswagen Black Beetle

2011

590

#18

 

10 Most-Effective Super Bowl Ads Using Humor (2010-2012)

 

Brand Ad Title

SB Year

Ace Score*

Ranking during SB Year

Doritos Sling Baby

2012

671

#1

M&Ms Just My Shell

2012

671

#1

Doritos Pug Attack

2011

662

#1

Doritos Man’s Best Friend

2012

645

#4

Pepsi Max Love Hurts

2011

643

#2

Doritos House Sitting

2011

635

#3

Pepsi Max Torpedo Cooler

2011

634

#4

Honda Matthew’s Day Off

2012

630

#7

Skechers Go Run Mr. Quiggly

2012

629

#8

Doritos Underdog

2010

621

#2

*Ace Score is the measure of ad creative effectiveness based on viewer reaction to national TV ads. Respondents are randomly selected and representative of the U.S. TV viewing audience. The results are presented on a scale of 1-950, which represents scoring on creative attributes such as persuasion, relevance, information, attention, change, desire and watchability. 

 

 

Posted in Advertising Research, Brand and Image Research | Comments Off

The many ways research finds us

You know how it is when you hear a new word for the first time or learn an actor’s name and then suddenly, you’re hearing it or seeing it at every turn? Working in marketing research has had that effect on me. If you’d told me 10 years ago that I would go on to write 20 or so marketing research-related articles and almost 50 blogs by the time I turned 30, I would’ve said, “What’s marketing research?”

Now, it’s everywhere I look. Most recently, my colleague Joe Rydholm and I were talking about our personal involvement in interest-specific panels. I was just invited to join one for expectant mothers through BabyCenter. Joe said he isn’t sure what his niche would be but that fantasy sports wouldn’t be a bad option.

In the true spirit of “once you’re thinking about it, it’s everywhere,” that afternoon I received a private message from a stranger on an online forum I’m a member of, inviting me to participate in a research study she’s conducting about fantasy sports. She was having trouble filling her female quota and noticed that, at some point in my tenure on the forum, I mentioned that it’s a hobby of mine.

The survey was hosted on a Qualtrics platform and I was even invited to participate in a follow-up phone interview, which I agreed to.

To be honest, before gaining some experience in MR, I probably wouldn’t have taken time out of my day to take the survey, let alone volunteer for the follow-up interview. Before, I imagined the research process to be something like the neglected suggestion box Michael Scott and friends rifled through on an episode of The Office. Now that I know how eager companies are to hear from consumers and how much consideration (most companies) give the feedback, I’m excited to get involved!

Working in MR has shown me how research contributes to the bigger cultural picture and helps dictate what products are created and marketed to us. I only wish I had realized sooner the microphone research was offering me and I like to think that, had I known how much companies and brands rely on research to move forward, I would’ve been more receptive.

It never ceases to amaze me how much more aware I am of the invitation to stay on the line after calling customer service, to take a satisfaction survey when I visit a Web site or to read the feedback from a local town hall-style focus group in the newspaper. Now that I know what I’m looking for, it’s everywhere.

So, I took the fantasy sports survey at work – all in the name of blogging research, right?! – and I was happy to help a researcher in need while playing the role of respondent.

How has research made itself evident in your daily life? How has it changed your behavior? Your perspective? How can we be more open with the general population about the research process to convince them that it matters?

Posted in Customer Satisfaction, Online Surveys and Research, Telephone Interviewing, The Business of Research | Comments Off

The key to a new you? Your smartphone and tablet

As more and more of us become dependent on our mobile devices to transact our daily lives – making them more and more viable as vehicles for research – a new study shows that we’re turning to them to improve our lives as well.

More than one-in-four mobile users (26.6 percent) plan to use their device to help keep their New Year’s resolutions on track, according to a recent analysis from Prosper Mobile Insights, Worthington, Ohio. More women (29.4 percent) than men (23.6 percent) say they plan to use a smartphone or tablet to help them follow through with all types of resolutions, from being on time to improving their health and becoming more budget-conscious:

Plan to Use Smartphone/Tablet to Help Keep Resolutions on Track
 (mobile users)

  • Being on time (calendar/alarms): 74.9%
  • Keeping in touch with people: 64.6%
  • Budgeting: 48.6%
  • Reading more: 41.9%
  • Counting calories/eating healthier: 40.6%
  • Organization (lists/notes): 40.5%
  • Stress relief: 33.9%
  • Couponing: 33.1%
  • Fitness tracking: 28.0%
  • Meeting new people/forming relationships: 21.5%
  • Quit smoking: 19.3%
  • Other: 1.3%

Source: Prosper Mobile Insights Mobile Survey, Dec. 2012

While men are more likely than women to use a smartphone or tablet to help them quit smoking (26.6 percent), track their fitness progress (33.9 percent) and meet new people (25.7 percent), women appear more likely to use mobile devices for stress relief (49.7 percent), couponing (46.9 percent) and calorie-counting (48.3 percent) in 2013.

The analysis also found that more mobile users (45.6 percent) vow to spend additional time with family and friends, while fewer (34.7 percent) plan to spend more time using their smartphone or tablet. Plans to stay in touch with loved ones were split between in-person and mobile methods, while mobile games seem to score against outdoor sports. No contest between apps – “free” is hot and “paid” is not:

Plan To Do More Often in 2013 vs. 2012 
(mobile users)

  • Spend time with family/friends: 45.6%
  • Spend time using my smartphone/tablet: 34.7%
  • Communicate with loved ones in person: 40.8%
  • Communicate with loved ones using my device: 40.5%
  • Use free apps: 41.7%
  • Buy apps: 10.9%
  • Play games on my device: 19.9%
  • Play sports/outdoor games: 13.9%
  • Shop on my device: 23.6%
  • Use my device to make payments: 23.0%
  • Integrate my life with my device: 19.3%

Source: Prosper Mobile Insights Mobile Survey, Dec. 2012

“Fresh off a holiday season which saw record numbers of consumers headed online, it’s interesting to note that nearly a quarter of mobile users are resolving to use their devices more often for shopping and payments,” said Pam Goodfellow, consumer insights director, BIGinsight, in a press release. “Clearly, the line between e-commerce and m-commerce will continue to blur into the New Year as the term ‘online shopping’ evolves.”

For the full, complimentary report, including segments for male and female mobile users, click here (registration required).

Posted in Consumer Research, Mobile Interviewing, Psychographic Research | Comments Off

Another great use of eye-tracking technology

I was watching the local news the other night and it featured a great feel-good piece on eye-tracking technology. While this story is not about marketing research or insights, it does show the great promise and possibilities of eye-tracking.

130101095237_DJ

Posted in Eye-tracking Research, Innovation in Market Research, Research Software, The Business of Research | Comments Off

Two takes on Black Friday/Cyber Monday

With Black Friday looming, the results from two studies give a glimpse into what retailers and shoppers can expect when the turkey’s gone and the malls open their doors. As taken from the respective companies’ press materials, the first entry examines the role of the smartphone and the second charts the emotional undercurrents of the day’s extreme bargain-hunting and also touches on the impact of Cyber Monday.

Despite the hype surrounding Black Friday, less than one-fifth (19 percent) definitely plan to hit the stores that day, according to the second annual PeriscopeIQ Retail Intelligence Survey. Additionally, consumers nationwide report that they will spend less on holiday shopping this year in overall expenditures, in amount spent per gift, and with fewer gifts given, indicating weaker holiday sales

The bad news is that, even prior to Hurricane Sandy, nearly a quarter (24 percent) plan to spend less on holiday shopping this year. Nearly three-fifths (58 percent) say they will spend the same overall and only 14 percent say they will increase holiday spending from 2011 levels. Moreover, the “Grinches” (17 percent) plan to purchase fewer gifts than last year while more than a fifth (22 percent), are planning on reducing their expenditures per gift.

“Even before the disastrous hurricane, the PeriscopeIQ Retail Intelligence Survey results suggested a weak holiday season, resulting in a one-two punch for retailers who are already dealing with margin erosion due to showrooming, price matching and pre-shopping with mobile and online technologies,” said Pawan Singh, CEO and chief scientist at Philadelphia-based PeriscopeIQ.

“With more than half of our respondents equipped with smartphones, the multichannel world is a boon to holiday shoppers but it can also be an advantage to retailers who address physical, mobile and online customer experiences with equal diligence. However, retailers will have to start pricing more aggressively earlier to bring storm-impacted shoppers back to stores in the Mid-Atlantic region.”

PeriscopeIQ conducts the representative survey of 1,000 U.S. consumers age 18 and older annually on behalf of its retail clients. Among the noteworthy findings in this year’s poll:

QR-code red!

While retailers and marketers are printing QR codes on ads, point-of-sale items and price tags, the PeriscopeIQ study revealed that nearly three-fifths (59 percent) of shoppers don’t know what they are or what they do. Further, 18 percent said they had ever used one in a retail environment, although 60 percent own smartphones with built-in scanners or apps. “QR codes haven’t lived up to their potential as a way to access coupons or provide suitable product information, in part due to lack of understanding or because the experience is unsatisfactory,” said Mohamed Latib, COO of PeriscopeIQ. “We believe that QR codes will continue to evolve but the actual 2-D code will be transformed by a newer, more efficient technology in the near future.”

Work-a-shoppers

As many as 40 percent of those polled are shopping online at work during the holidays and year-round. The PeriscopeIQ Survey found that over a quarter of those polled shop more than 15 minutes daily. Half of respondents ages 18-34 spend as much as 20 minutes daily shopping online.

Free shipping

Virtually all respondents (95 percent) stated that free shipping is an important factor in deciding from which Web sites to make their purchases. “While the number of online shoppers in the survey is about even from last year, bricks-and-mortar retailers will need to continue to maintain this feature in their arsenals,” Singh said.

Black Friday more blue

Despite the hoopla about shopping on Black Friday, only a little more than a third (38 percent) will “definitely” or “probably” shop, while 60 percent won’t bother battling crowds the day after Thanksgiving.

Smartphones and smarter shoppers

According to the survey, consumers are becoming savvy shoppers, with more than two-fifths (41 percent) pre-shopping online vs. only 27 percent doing so last year. For example, 33 percent check prices at other stores or at Web sites. A similar number (36 percent) are using their phones to take pictures of merchandise, presumably for feedback from friends or family or for comparison shopping.

Fewer than five percent of respondents claim to use mobile wallets like Google Wallet or Passbook.

“Like” it or not

Another issue is consumer use of online reviews. Only 24 percent said they go online for reviews of products and services while shopping at a store. “This indicates that, while consumers rely somewhat on the Internet for information, if only a minority consult reviews while shopping, many buyers aren’t getting the full picture on positive and negative aspects of their purchases,” Singh said.

Black, white and read

Lastly, while much of the survey focuses on electronic shopping and innovative retail technologies, an interesting finding is that when it comes to product information, sales and other shopping information, nearly three-fifths (58 percent) still rely on print magazines and newspapers. This is more than twice the number who look at online reviews while shopping.

A second study, from Provo, Utah-based research firm Qualtrics, shows that most American consumers have a strong emotional attachment to Black Friday shopping – almost half say the hoopla of discounts and television ads gets them “excited to get holiday shopping underway.”

Only 15 percent of shoppers said they find the Black Friday experience “frightening” when it comes to the lines, stampedes and fighting in the aisles that typically make the news. Almost a third of those surveyed say they will be standing in line waiting for doors to open on Black Friday.

“American marketers have done a masterful job at crafting the traditional kick-off of holiday shopping into an event most shoppers revere,” said Danielle Wanderer, chief marketing officer at Qualtrics. “There’s no other single day of the year when American shoppers drop their mouse and head to their favorite brick-and-mortar retailer.”

Black Friday vs. Cyber Monday

In fact, 74 percent of shoppers surveyed rated their Black Friday experience as “somewhat satisfying” to “very satisfying,” proving most haven’t been put off by the hustle, bustle and scuffle inside stores. Overall, more American shoppers (56 percent) said they’d be standing in line or dropping by stores at some point on Black Friday versus those that will be shopping online only (28 percent).

But online shopping on Cyber Monday gets an even better customer satisfaction rating than that of Black Friday. Over 90 percent of shoppers rated their online shopping experience as “somewhat satisfying” to “very satisfying.” Only 16 percent of consumers say they won’t be doing any shopping at all on Black Friday.

Lose the holiday cheer

When it comes to in-store holiday cheer, American consumers turn into Scrooge, as only 5 percent say that improving the joyful holiday atmosphere in-store would get retailers more of their business. And like the cranky Scrooge, consumers really want to keep money in their pockets, with more than half of shoppers (52 percent) saying that discounts would be most influential when making decisions about where to shop during the holidays.

While discounts are the most critical influence on consumer buying decisions this holiday season, shoppers surveyed did say quality products, helpful sales staff and convenience can influence their decision of where to buy as well.

Mobile trails in the holiday shopping race

Mobile shopping is expected to surge this holiday season, but a quarter of shoppers surveyed say they’ll research gifts with their phone or tablet device and then travel to the store to buy. Only 10 percent of shoppers said they’ll be purchasing holiday gifts on their mobile device.

With the economic recovery still slow to take hold, what kind of bounty should most families expect under the tree this year? About two-thirds of shoppers, or 62 percent, said they plan to spend up to $600 on holiday gifts. Only about 14 percent say they’ll spend $1,000 or more this holiday season.

Qualtrics and Research Now surveyed 1,100 general consumers from November 2-November 5, 2012. The sample was drawn from a Research Now online opt-in panel of U.S. general consumers. The survey was conducted online via Research Now’s Valued Opinions Panel and social media sample. Respondents were provided with an identical questionnaire asking for feedback specific to Black Friday and Cyber Monday.

Posted in Consumer Research, Customer Satisfaction, Online Surveys and Research, Panels | Comments Off

Market research analyst: a desirable profession

Having just returned from The Market Research Event 2012 in Boca Raton, Fla., it’s obvious to us that researchers are passionate and invested in their careers. And why shouldn’t they be?! Researchers have it pretty good compared to the rest of America’s workforce and the profession is gaining ground, according to a November 1 article, “2012 Best Jobs in America,” for CNNMoney.com, which placed “market research analyst” at seven in the top-10 list:

7. Market Research Analyst

Median pay: $63,100
Top pay: $97,700
10-year job growth: 41.2 percent
Total jobs*: 282,700

What do they do all day? Coke or Pepsi? Android or iPhone? Chevy or Toyota? You know what you like. It’s the job of market research analysts to find out why. From direct surveys to dissecting buckets of data, they track what consumers want – and what it would take to change their minds.

How to get the job? A head for numbers with a background in statistics, computer science and economics are essential to being more, um, marketable, as it were. The ability to distill those numbers into useful reports is a must.

What makes it great? An analyst is a key member of the team that develops great new products. The position runs across all industries that need research. And it’s got the second-highest growth rate of all the jobs on our list.

What’s the catch?
Analysts who don’t need glasses yet, will soon enough. They spend hours poring over facts, figures and numbers. It’s a detail-driven field that operates under tight deadlines and has potential for long hours. –Tom Ziegler

*Total jobs is estimated number of people working in broader Bureau of Labor Statistics “job family.”

Tell us, researchers, does market research analyst deserve the seventh spot on the list? What do you think of this summary of your life’s work? Is it as great as this list makes it seem? What aspects might have been overlooked? Are the compensation averages in line with what you’re earning?

Posted in Market Research in the News, Marketing Research Jobs, The Business of Research | Comments Off

Will research get the election right?

Of all the recent changes in marketing research I’ve been particularly fascinated by those that are pushing the limits of traditional research by combining data sets. With today being Election Day in the United States, I thought it would be interesting to take a look at how this is being done to predict the outcome of the 2012 election.

I recently came across www.FiveThirtyEight.com, which is a polling aggregation site with a blog created by Nate Silver. The site takes its name from the number of electors in the United States Electoral College.

Silver first gained public recognition for developing PECOTA (player empirical comparison and optimization test algorithm), a system for forecasting the performance and career development of Major League Baseball players. PECOTA projects the future performance of hitters and pitchers by relying on matching a given current player to a set of “comparable” players whose past performance can serve as a guide to how the given current player is likely to perform in the future. In addition, PECOTA calculates a range of probable performance levels rather than a single a value such as batting average.

Silver then applied these same principles to the 2008 presidential election, weighting each poll based on the pollster’s historical track record, sample size and recentness of the poll but also supplementing this data with additional information available in polls from “similar” states. He carried this approach one step further by also factoring national polling trends into the estimates for a given state. The idea is that this additional data, when applied correctly, would help to fill the gaps in information about the trends in a given state. It was especially useful in states for which there were few if any polls. (Additional aspects of the methodology are described in a detailed FAQ on FiveThirtyEight.com.) Using this methodology Silver correctly predicted the winner of 49 of the 50 states in the 2008 election, missing only one state which had a winning vote margin of 1%. Even more impressive, he predicted all 35 of the Senate races.

So will Nate Silver be successful again this year? Check out his predictions.

Hopefully we will know the answer before January 20th!

Posted in Market Research in the News, Political Polling, Research Blogs and Communities, Research Industry Trends | Comments Off

Do elections bring out the worst in research?

Two weeks ago, I received a call on our landline phone from a local number and woman’s name I didn’t recognize. When I answered, a man said that he was conducting a nationwide political poll. Without identifying himself or the company or organization he was representing, he asked me two simple questions:

  1. Who do you plan to vote for in the upcoming presidential election?
  2. Do you feel that the country is headed in the right direction or going down the wrong path?

Then, he thanked me for my responses and hung up.

This is the first presidential election in which I’ve been of voting age and had a landline so I’m not particularly knowledgeable in what telephone polling entails but this struck me as very odd. The caller didn’t identify himself, didn’t ask me to identify myself – neglecting to ask even if I was over 18 years old – and asked a very subjective question. I also found it strange that the number was local and linked to a residential name but then again, our home phone shows up on other people’s Caller ID as “Lana Stark” so I can let that one slide.

Wanting to give the benefit of the doubt, I thought it might have been a company I’d answered a survey with before that already had my demographic information on file, saving me the trouble this time around. In that case, kudos!

But then I got a call last Friday from the same number. I answered, thinking maybe it was a follow-up call. It wasn’t. It was the exact same call as before. I was asked two questions and then abruptly hung up on without a chance to get a word in edgewise to say, “Hey, I’ve already answered this poll.” So not only does the company really not know who I am, it also has my responses counted twice in its “nationwide poll.” If this company can’t even keep track of who’s already answered the exact same poll, how much stock can we put in the results? I would argue not much.

My first telephone polling experience was a laugh and a half and I’m wondering: Is this a one-off or par for the course? What’s the point in conducting a poll like this if no one takes the time to ensure that the data is valid and unduplicated? Are there companies so desperate to get a piece of the election-time pie that they will be lax on quality control to get the job done? Has anyone else had a similar situation? What should a sound political telephone poll look like?

Posted in Political Polling, Public Opinion/Social Research, Quantitative Research | 2 Comments

Smash Mute: What is shutting up the ads worth to you?

With the debates leading up to Decision 2012 behind us, it’s only a few short weeks until all is settled at the polls on November 6th. In that time, however, TV viewers can expect the campaign ads and mudslinging therein to ramp up in last-ditch efforts to sway voters.

Well, according to Bill Ward’s October 23rd article, “A smash hit with television viewers,” in the Star Tribune, a Minnesota-born invention could help TV viewers silence the noise – literally. “Smash Mute, a stand-alone device 200 times bigger than that infernal, impossible-to-find mute button on most remotes, makes it infinitely easier to silence not just political propaganda but any commercial (no more Flo), annoying talking head or even Honey Boo Boo.”

This device, which features a large, circular button that has “SHUT THE #*@% UP!” printed in it, aims to solve the problem of being too slow on the trigger to successfully avoid the annoyances. It’s a clever contraption but I wonder if Smash Mute is solving a “problem” that doesn’t exist. With the ubiquity of DVRs and the fact that – guess what? – TVs already have this capability, it’s questionable how many TV viewers will shell out $25 on a supersized mute button.

Still, Smash Mute’s existence and exposure, along with devices like Dish Network’s Hopper DVR, which allows consumers to set the DVR to automatically skip over ads in playback mode, indicate just how unwelcome some Americans view blaring TV commercials. But Smash Mute makes me question consumers’ overall receptivity to advertising. Yes, it can be a nuisance but it’s one most of us have learned to live with. Is finding the miniature mute button really that hard or are we mostly OK with commercials?

Would you buy a SHUT THE #*@% UP! button? Why or why not? Does Smash Mute’s potential success tell us anything about consumers’ attitude toward advertising? Would we all mute commercials if it were easier? No one ever said we have to like advertising for it to work but does advertising only succeed because we’re too lazy to block it out?

Posted in Advertising Research | 1 Comment

Diners find mobile-aided ordering palatable

From offering consumers apps to pre-order food, touch screens for food selections and orders taken on a tablet by an employee, it’s clear that fast-food, quick-service and full-service restaurants are attempting to carve out a piece of the mobile pie. The good news for dining establishments is that generally speaking, mobile users are open to trying these new twists to the ordering ritual. The bad news? For nearly half of mobile users, the jury is still out on whether the use of mobile technology at restaurants actually makes the experience better, according to a recent survey conducted by Prosper Mobile Insights.

For those who’ve chosen a side, it seems as though tablet order-takers and order-ahead apps are more likely to improve the dining out experience. Among mobile users who were asked the question “Do you think the use of mobile technology in ordering at a restaurant makes your experience better or worse?” being able to order on their own mobile device ahead of time was seen as making their experience better by 59.8 percent of diners (5.7 percent said this would make things worse). Having an employee take their order in line at a quick-service restaurant (Panera, Chipotle): 45.3 percent said better; 7.3 percent worse. Having an employee take their order in a fast-food drive-thru: 41.7 percent said better; 8.8 percent worse. Having an employee take their order at a full-service restaurant: 41.4 percent said better; 9.1 percent said worse.

“Consumers are more likely to think mobile will improve their eating experiences when they are in a rush – for instance, in a drive-thru – versus those occasions when they want to unwind – say feasting at a full-service restaurant,” said Pam Goodfellow, consumer insights director at BIGinsight, in a press release.

Just under half (43.2 percent) have experienced some form of mobile ordering at a restaurant. Nearly a quarter (24.2 percent) have used their smartphone or tablet to place an order ahead of time; 21.1 percent had an employee in a drive-thru use mobile to take their order and 17.5 percent have experienced this at a quick-service restaurant or sit-down establishment. This trend is only likely to grow: mobile usage continues to climb and early adopters seem to approve of the use of smartphones and tablets to better their dining out experiences.

Other findings on mobile users:

• Over half (52.3 percent) say they’ve used their smartphone or tablet as a coupon (by scanning a bar code or showing a text or e-mail to a cashier, etc.).

• Three in five (60.1 percent) say location-based coupons are convenient and useful. However, 45.3 percent are concerned about security issues and their location being tracked.

• The majority (56.8 percent) would prefer to receive coupons on a smartphone or tablet via e-mail. One in four (24.5 percent) prefer to receive promotions automatically when they are near a store.

Click here for more information on the study (registration required).

Posted in Consumer Research, Food/Sensory Research | Comments Off